ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
A mandibular advancement device associated with lingual control: a new treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea?
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOral appliances (OA) have become the main alternative to positive pressure airway devices (PAP) for the control of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite literature support, controversies about the mode of action and the effectiveness of these devices persist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified mandibular advancement devices (MAD) in patients with OSA who failed treatment with MAD and to evaluate the role of the tongue as a factor in patients who failed treatment with MAD. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients unable to control the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) using a MAD were subsequently treated with a modified version that included a tongue trimming accessory. The objective was to stabilize the tongue by preventing it from sliding with the consequent collapse of the upper airway (UA). New polysomnography (PSG) was performed with the modified MAD in place.
resultsA total of 20 patients who failed MAD therapy were studied including 15 men (75%) with mean age (± standard deviation) of 58.5 ± 13.1 years and BMI 29.6 ± 5.0 Kg/m
conclusionThe results suggest that the tongue, even in the presence of a MAD, may be one of the contributing factors for the collapse of the UA and consequent device ineffectiveness. By stabilizing the tongue through the insertion of a tongue trimmer, the MAD became more effective in many cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.