Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875722›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Attitudes and factors influencing organ donation decision-making in Damascus, Syria: a cross-sectional study.

Jameel Soqia, Jamal Ataya, Rawan Alhomsi, Horiya Soqia, Ameer Kakaje, Rakan Saadoun, Ammar Hamzeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Organ donation and HIV: Awareness and willingness to be a living donor among people with HIV in Uganda.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Article
  16. The Ripple Effect: Aftereffects and Social Consequences of Organ Donation Decisions.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jameel SoqiaFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria. jameelsoqia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-0489
Jamal AtayaFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria.
Rawan AlhomsiFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Horiya SoqiaFaculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Ameer KakajeFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Rakan SaadounMedical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ammar HamzehFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Damascus University · SYBarwon Health · AUGerman Cardiac Society · DEHoms University · SYUniversity of Aleppo · SYUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ donation is vital to saving lives, but its success depends on people's willingness to donate organs. This descriptive cross-sectional survey aimed to investigate attitudes towards organ donation in Damascus, Syria. Understanding attitudes is crucial for the success of organ donation programs, especially in countries with similar settings. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey aimed at understanding patients' attitudes towards organ donation in Damascus, Syria. Data was collected through a carefully constructed validated survey through face-to-face interviews. 600 participants were randomly interviewed, 62.8% agreed to donate their organs after death, with helping others being the primary reason. Religious beliefs were the primary reason for organ refusal in males, while for females, it was lack of knowledge and religious beliefs. However, there were no significant differences between genders or educational level and age groups in the acceptance of organ donation. The percentage of those who agree to donate their organs after death encourages taking an effective step to build an integrated donation system, not just a center. Bearing in mind that there is no correlation with age, gender or even educational level, which means that the system may include different groups of society.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesSyriaTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID37875722
PMCPMC10598269
OpenAlexW4387906866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.