Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875694›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2023

Transfer of skills between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Pia Iben Pietersen, Peter Hertz, Rikke Groth Olsen, Louise Birch Møller, Lars Konge, Flemming Bjerrum

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. An audit of training opportunities in a tertiary level unit.Irish journal of medical science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pia Iben PietersenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 10, Entrance 112, 2nd floor, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. pia.iben.pietersen3@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-3635
Peter HertzDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Rikke Groth OlsenCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Louise Birch MøllerCenter for HR & Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars KongeCenter for HR & Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Flemming BjerrumCenter for HR & Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted surgery is today well-implemented in many surgical specialties, but requires another skill set than laparoscopy. Most often, robot-assisted surgery is considered add-on to laparoscopic skills but very little is known about the transfer of skills. The aim of the study was to examine to what extent surgical skills are transferable between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science). Studies investigating transfer of skills between laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery in either a phantom-based, simulation-based, animal model, or clinical setting were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was done using the Medical education research study quality instrument and educational New Ottawa Scale.

resultsOf 15,610 studies identified, 89 studies continued to full-text reading, and 37 studies were included. Four studies were found non-comparable and were left out of the results for the primary outcome. All 33 studies explored transfer from laparoscopy to robot-assisted surgery and 17 found a positive transfer whereas 15 did not. Only 11 studies explored transfer from robot-assisted surgery to laparoscopy, of which only three found a positive transfer.

conclusionAn almost equal number of publications found a positive transfer and no transfer from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery. Fewer studies explored the transfer from robot-assisted surgery to laparoscopy. Very little evidence supports that surgeons trained solely in robot-assisted surgery can perform laparoscopy. This must be considered in future training programs as robot-assisted surgery is expected to become the first-in-line modality for many future surgeons.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationHumansLaparoscopyMedical educationRobot-assisted surgerySurgeryTechnical skillsTransfer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.