Trial reportScientific reports2023
Evaluating probiotic efficacy on weight loss in adults with overweight through a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04897698 (LB001 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LB001 Study: Probiotics for Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of oral supplementation of probiotics on body weight and visceral fat in obese patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Precise probiotic therapy: Advances, bottlenecks, and the road to microbiome-informed nutrition.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- From gut dysbiosis to eubiosis: understanding microbiome recovery as an ecological process.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Early-life proteomic and microbiome features signal obesity risk across 26 years of follow-up.mSystems · 2026Article
- Article
- Probiotics in reducing obesity by reconfiguring the gut microbiota.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Clinically Effective Molecules of Natural Origin for Obesity Prevention or Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to assess the weight-reducing effects of various doses of a probiotic dietary supplement and evaluate the tolerance and safety of increased dosage. A 3-month double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, followed by a 3-month open phase, was conducted at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. The probiotic compound AB001 was tested at two doses (single and double) and compared with placebo during the blinded phase, and at triple dose during the open phase. Eighty-one volunteers, 18-45 years old, with overweight were included. The primary outcome was change in weight. Secondary outcomes were changes in; BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, blood lipids, glucose metabolism, liver enzymes, vitamin levels, and bowel habits. After 3 months (n = 81), no difference in weight, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, or biomarkers were observed between the groups. Forty-five individuals continued with triple dose. The group with initial single dose decreased 0.93 ± 4.73 kg (p = 0.34), and the group with double dose initially decreased 1.93 ± 3.70 kg (p = 0.027). Reported changes in bowel habits and gastro-intestinal problems were similar for all doses. The results indicate that a long-term use of at least double dose AB001 may be more beneficial for weight loss than lower doses. However, in the double blinded phase, no differences between groups were found. The probiotic compound AB001 was well tolerated and can safely be used up to double dose for 90 days followed by triple dose for 90 days.Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov NCT04897698, registered on 21 May 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.