Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875559›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Evaluating probiotic efficacy on weight loss in adults with overweight through a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

Pernilla Danielsson, Resthie R Putri, Claude Marcus, Emilia Hagman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04897698 (LB001 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04897698 nacompletednot on this map

LB001 Study: Probiotics for Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2021 to 2022Enrolled81ConditionsOverweightArmsLB001
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Probiotics in reducing obesity by reconfiguring the gut microbiota.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pernilla DanielssonDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Resthie R PutriDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Claude MarcusDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Emilia HagmanDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. emilia.hagman@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to assess the weight-reducing effects of various doses of a probiotic dietary supplement and evaluate the tolerance and safety of increased dosage. A 3-month double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, followed by a 3-month open phase, was conducted at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. The probiotic compound AB001 was tested at two doses (single and double) and compared with placebo during the blinded phase, and at triple dose during the open phase. Eighty-one volunteers, 18-45 years old, with overweight were included. The primary outcome was change in weight. Secondary outcomes were changes in; BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, blood lipids, glucose metabolism, liver enzymes, vitamin levels, and bowel habits. After 3 months (n = 81), no difference in weight, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, or biomarkers were observed between the groups. Forty-five individuals continued with triple dose. The group with initial single dose decreased 0.93 ± 4.73 kg (p = 0.34), and the group with double dose initially decreased 1.93 ± 3.70 kg (p = 0.027). Reported changes in bowel habits and gastro-intestinal problems were similar for all doses. The results indicate that a long-term use of at least double dose AB001 may be more beneficial for weight loss than lower doses. However, in the double blinded phase, no differences between groups were found. The probiotic compound AB001 was well tolerated and can safely be used up to double dose for 90 days followed by triple dose for 90 days.Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov NCT04897698, registered on 21 May 2021.

Indexed as

OverweightProbioticsAdolescentAdultBiomarkersDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedWeight LossYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37875559
PMCPMC10597999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.