Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875551›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

SaLT&PepPr is an interface-predicting language model for designing peptide-guided protein degraders.

Garyk Brixi, Tianzheng Ye, Lauren Hong, Tian Wang, Connor Monticello, Natalia Lopez-Barbosa, Sophia Vincoff, Vivian Yudistyra, Lin Zhao, Elena Haarer and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computationally Evidence-Grounded Sequence-First Design of Peptide Binders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Peptide-functionalized nanoparticles for brain-targeted therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of Hemp Seed Proteins (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. AccuratebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garyk Brixi *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tianzheng Ye *Robert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Lauren Hong *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tian WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Connor MonticelloMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Natalia Lopez-BarbosaRobert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Sophia VincoffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Vivian YudistyraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-9232
Lin ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Elena HaarerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0496-6203
Tianlai ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sarah PertsemlidisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kalyan PalepuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Suhaas BhatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jayani ChristopherDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Xinning LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tong LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sue ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lillian PetersenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew P DeLisaRobert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Pranam ChatterjeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. pranam.chatterjee@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-8478
Duke University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Programmable peptide-guided protein degradationR21CA278468 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHATTERJEE, PRANAM · 2023 to 2023
$388k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA278468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are critical for biological processes and predicting the sites of these interactions is useful for both computational and experimental applications. We present a Structure-agnostic Language Transformer and Peptide Prioritization (SaLT&PepPr) pipeline to predict interaction interfaces from a protein sequence alone for the subsequent generation of peptidic binding motifs. Our model fine-tunes the ESM-2 protein language model (pLM) with a per-position prediction task to identify PPI sites using data from the PDB, and prioritizes motifs which are most likely to be involved within inter-chain binding. By only using amino acid sequence as input, our model is competitive with structural homology-based methods, but exhibits reduced performance compared with deep learning models that input both structural and sequence features. Inspired by our previous results using co-crystals to engineer target-binding "guide" peptides, we curate PPI databases to identify partners for subsequent peptide derivation. Fusing guide peptides to an E3 ubiquitin ligase domain, we demonstrate degradation of endogenous β-catenin, 4E-BP2, and TRIM8, and highlight the nanomolar binding affinity, low off-targeting propensity, and function-altering capability of our best-performing degraders in cancer cells. In total, our study suggests that prioritizing binders from natural interactions via pLMs can enable programmable protein targeting and modulation.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteinsAmino Acid SequenceUbiquitin-Protein LigasesPeptidesProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID37875551
PMCPMC10598214
OpenAlexW4387906121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.