Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875536›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Long-term health impacts of COVID-19 among 242,712 adults in England.

Christina J Atchison, Bethan Davies, Emily Cooper, Adam Lound, Matthew Whitaker, Adam Hampshire, Adriana Azor, Christl A Donnelly, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Graham S Cooke and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Rehabilitation needs of long COVID patients in British Columbia.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bridging Gaps in Long COVID Therapy: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Challenges of Inclusion: A Population-Based Interview Study of Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina J AtchisonSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8304-7389
Bethan DaviesSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-7641
Emily CooperSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1834-1036
Adam LoundSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matthew WhitakerSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adam HampshireDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adriana AzorDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christl A DonnellySchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-2463
Marc Chadeau-HyamSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8341-5436
Graham S CookeImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-5056
Helen WardSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-5036
Paul ElliottSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. p.elliott@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-5684
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBHealth Data Research UK · GBMRC Centre for Environment and HealthUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215Department of Health COV-LT-0040Medical Research Council MC_PC_17114Medical Research Council MC_PC_20029Medical Research Council MC_PC_20049Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1Medical Research Council MR/V030841/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is having a lasting impact on health and well-being. We compare current self-reported health, quality of life and symptom profiles for people with ongoing symptoms following COVID-19 to those who have never tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who have recovered from COVID-19. Overall, 276,840/800,000 (34·6%) of invited participants took part. Mental health and health-related quality of life were worse among participants with ongoing persistent symptoms post-COVID compared with those who had never had COVID-19 or had recovered. In this study, median duration of COVID-related symptoms (N = 130,251) was 1·3 weeks (inter-quartile range 6 days to 2 weeks), with 7·5% and 5·2% reporting ongoing symptoms ≥12 weeks and ≥52 weeks respectively. Female sex, ≥1 comorbidity and being infected when Wild-type variant was dominant were associated with higher probability of symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks and longer recovery time in those with persistent symptoms. Although COVID-19 is usually of short duration, some adults experience persistent and burdensome illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultEnglandFemaleHumansPandemicsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37875536
PMCPMC10598213
OpenAlexW4387909516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.