ArticleNature communications2023
lesSDRF is more: maximizing the value of proteomics data through streamlined metadata annotation.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardized Annotation of Quantitative Proteomics Datasets Using SDRF-Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Temporal and Functional Profiling of the Microbiome of High and Low Nitrogen Content Barley Seed in Silo Storage.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics.Microbiome · 2026Article
- MLMarker: a machine learning framework for tissue inference and biomarker discovery.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Identification of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Extracellular Matrix Signatures from In-Depth Proteomic Profiling that Correlate with Lymphocyte Infiltration.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Review
- TheJournal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Next Decade of Proteomics with Standardized, Structured Metadata.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- Preventing Proteomics Data Tombs Through Collective Responsibility and Community Engagement.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Comparative proteomic analysis of the ECM composition of the human omentum and mesentery, the main sites of ovarian cancer metastasis.iScience · 2026Article
- BioSamples database: the global hub for sample metadata and multi-omics integration.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2026: making proteomics data FAIR.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- PaxDb v6.0: reprocessed, LLM-selected, curated protein abundance data across organisms.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Metabolomic and proteomic differences in susceptible and benzimidazole-resistant adult females and males of Haemonchus contortus.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Article
- Potential of Proteomics in Forensic Phenotyping: A Focus on Biological Sex Estimation.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Facilitating analysis and dissemination of proteomics data through metadata integration in MaxQuant.Nature communications · 2025Article
- MHCquant2 refines immunopeptidomics tumor antigen discovery.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public proteomics data often lack essential metadata, limiting its potential. To address this, we present lesSDRF, a tool to simplify the process of metadata annotation, thereby ensuring that data leave a lasting, impactful legacy well beyond its initial publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.