ArticleScientific reports2023
Radiomics-clinical nomogram based on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT radiomics features for individualized prediction of local failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics Using Fused PET and CT Data for Prognostic and Diagnostic Modeling in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the prognostic significance of PET/CT-based radiomics signatures and clinical features for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively reviewed 726 patients who underwent pretreatment PET/CT at our center. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the Cox proportional hazards model were applied to construct Rad-score, which represented the radiomics features of PET-CT images. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to establish a nomogram model. The concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to stratify the local recurrence risk of patients. The nomogram was validated by evaluating its discrimination ability and calibration in the validation cohort. A total of eight features were selected to construct Rad-score. A radiomics-clinical nomogram was built after the selection of univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses, including the Rad-score and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The C-index was 0.71 (0.67-0.74) in the training cohort and 0.70 (0.64-0.76) in the validation cohort. The nomogram also performed far better than the 8th T-staging system with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.75 vs. 0.60 for 2 years and 0.71 vs. 0.60 for 3 years. The calibration curves show that the nomogram indicated accurate predictions. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed significantly better net benefits with this nomogram model. The log-rank test results revealed a distinct difference in prognosis between the two risk groups. The PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram showed good performance in predicting LRFS and showed potential to identify patients at high-risk of developing NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.