Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875314›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Psychiatric inpatient services in Ontario, 2019-2021: a cross-sectional comparison of admissions, diagnoses and acuity during the COVID-19 prerestriction, restriction and postrestriction periods.

Elke Ham, N Zoe Hilton, Jennifer Crawford, Soyeon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Profile of male acute admissions at a state psychiatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elke HamWaypoint Research Institute (Ham, Hilton, Crawford, Kim), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Hilton), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Crawford), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (Kim), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. eham@waypointcentre.ca.
N Zoe HiltonWaypoint Research Institute (Ham, Hilton, Crawford, Kim), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Hilton), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Crawford), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (Kim), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Jennifer CrawfordWaypoint Research Institute (Ham, Hilton, Crawford, Kim), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Hilton), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Crawford), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (Kim), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Soyeon KimWaypoint Research Institute (Ham, Hilton, Crawford, Kim), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Hilton), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Crawford), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (Kim), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased mental health problems in the general population, yet psychiatric hospital admissions decreased. Early evidence suggested that psychiatric admissions normalized within weeks; we sought to examine the longer-lasting impacts on the psychiatric inpatient population beyond this initial period.

methodsWe compared Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for patients admitted to 8 psychiatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 3 time periods - before restrictions were imposed (June 22, 2019, to Mar. 16, 2020), during restrictions (Mar. 17 to June 21, 2020) and after restrictions were lifted (June 22, 2020, to Mar. 16, 2021) for changes in involuntary status, diagnoses and clinical presentation using descriptive analysis. For clinical presentation, we extracted scores on 4 Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health symptom scales (Depressive Severity Index, Cognitive Performance Scale, Positive Symptoms Scale-Long Version and Social Withdrawal Scale), and 2 behaviour scales (Aggressive Behavior Scale and Violence Sum).

resultsA cross-sectional sample of 9848 patients was included in the analysis. The mean number of daily admissions decreased 19% from 16.4 (standard deviation [SD] 8.0) before the restriction period to 13.3 (SD 6.1) during the restriction period, and was still 6% below prerestriction levels after restrictions were lifted 15.4 (SD 6.8), with standard error difference of 1.03 (95% confidence interval -0.22 to 2.29). From the pre- to the postrestriction periods, the proportion of involuntary patients increased by 6 percentage points, and the proportions of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder or personality disorder increased by 4 percentage points and 1 percentage point, respectively.

interpretationPsychiatric admissions did not fully return to prerestriction levels in absolute rates and patient acuity after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. Psychiatric services must prepare to appraise and respond to any increased acuity through interventions for patients, workforce planning and mental health support for staff.

Identifiers

PMID37875314
PMCPMC10609896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.