ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024
Importance of antenatal identification of small for gestational age fetuses on perinatal and childhood outcomes: A register-based cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of a Routine Third Trimester Ultrasound Policy on Obstetric, Neonatal and Service Delivery Outcomes in an Australian Tertiary Centre.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Intrapartum Fetal Compromise in Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction Using the Modified Myocardial Performance Index: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- The importance of socioeconomic factors on antenatal identification of small for gestational age pregnancies: Exploring health inequalities in the antenatal care in Sweden.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of a Two (32/38 Weeks) versus One (36 Weeks) Ultrasound Protocol for the Detection of Decreased Fetal Growth and Adverse Perinatal Outcome.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Importance of antenatal identification of small for gestational age fetuses on perinatal and childhood outcomes: A register-based cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Neurological examination of healthy term infants at ages 6 and 10 weeks in Tshwane District.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with increased risk for stillbirth, perinatal morbidity, cerebral palsy, neurodevelopmental disorders and cardiovascular disease later in life. Identifying small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses is crucial for the diagnosis of FGR. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between antenatal identification of SGA fetuses and severe adverse perinatal and childhood outcome. MATERIAL AND
methodsA register-based cohort study of all newborns delivered in Stockholm in 2014 and 2017. INCLUSION CRITERIA: singleton pregnancies without chromosomal aberrations or structural abnormalities, with a gestational age at delivery between 22+0 and 43+0 (n = 48 843). Data from childbirth records were linked to data from nationwide Swedish registers. Pregnancy including offspring data were reviewed. Adverse outcomes for non-identified and identified SGA newborns were compared using logistic regression models. Primary outcome was a composite outcome called severe adverse outcome, defined as at least one of the following: stillbirth, severe newborn distress (Apgar score <4 at 5 min, pH <7 or resuscitation activities >10 min), severe neonatal outcome (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy 2-3, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal seizures, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3-4, bronchopulmonary disease or death at <1 year), severe childhood outcome (cognitive impairment or motor impairment or cerebral palsy or hearing impairment or visual impairment or death at 1-3 years old). Secondary outcomes were stillbirth, severe newborn distress, severe neonatal outcome, severe childhood outcome.
resultsNo association was found between antenatal identification of SGA fetuses and severe adverse outcome using the complete composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.53). In subgroup analyses, non-identified SGA fetuses had an almost fivefold increased risk for stillbirth (aOR 4.79, 95% CI 2.63-8.72) and an increased risk for severe newborn distress (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.82), but a decreased risk for severe childhood outcome (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.99). No association was found between antenatal identification of SGA and severe neonatal outcome.
conclusionsNon-identified SGA fetuses have an increased risk for stillbirth and severe newborn distress. Conversely, identified SGA fetuses have an increased risk for severe childhood outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.