Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875156›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical screening2024

Awareness and knowledge about HPV and primary HPV screening among women in Great Britain: An online population-based survey.

Jo Waller, Frances Waite, Laura Marlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jo WallerCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4025-9132
Frances WaiteCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-4482
Laura MarlowCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-2397

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing for cervical screening is being implemented around the world. We explored HPV awareness, and knowledge about primary screening in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales), where it has been in place for several years, ahead of extended screening intervals being implemented in England. SETTING/

methodsWomen aged 18-70 (

resultsOverall, 77.6% (1499/1930) of women were aware of HPV. When asked to identify the statement describing how cervical screening works, only 12.2% (236/1930) correctly selected the statement reflecting HPV primary screening (13.5% (194/1436) in screening-eligible women). Excluding those unaware of HPV, most participants had heard about the virus in the context of cervical screening (981/1596; 61.5%) or HPV vaccination (1079/1596; 67.6%). Mean knowledge score was 3.7 out of 8 (SD = 2.2) in this group. Most knew that an HPV-positive result does not mean a woman will definitely develop cervical cancer (1091/1499; 72.8%) but far fewer were aware of the long timeline for HPV to develop into cervical cancer (280/1499; 18.7%).

conclusionsOnly three-quarters of women in Britain are aware of HPV, and knowledge of primary screening is very low, even among screening-age women. This points to continued need for awareness-raising campaigns to ensure informed choice about screening and mitigate public concern when screening intervals are extended.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung Adultcervical screeningHPV primary screeningKnowledgescreening intervalsunderstanding

Identifiers

PMID37875156
PMCPMC11083738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.