Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875155›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

Amphetamine Positivity Prior to Burn Surgery Does not Adversely Affect Intraoperative Outcomes.

Nada Rizk, David Crawford, Yvonne Karanas, Christopher Barnes, Tam N Pham, Clifford C Sheckter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nada RizkDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 770 Welch Road suite 400, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-5005
David CrawfordUW Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave Seattle, WA 98104, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8035-2318
Yvonne KaranasRegional Burn Center, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 751 S Bascom Ave San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Christopher BarnesUW Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave Seattle, WA 98104, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8347-8143
Tam N PhamUW Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave Seattle, WA 98104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-7745
Clifford C SheckterDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 770 Welch Road suite 400, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
University of Washington · USSanta Clara Valley Medical Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of burn patients using amphetamines is challenging due hemodynamic liabilty and altered physiology. Wide variation exists in the operative timing for this patient population. We hypothesize that burn excision in patients admitted with amphetamine positivity is safe regardless of timing. Data from two verified burn centers between 2017 and 2022 with differing practice patterns in operative timing for amphetamine-positive patients. Center A obtains toxicology only on admission and proceeds with surgery based on hemodynamic status and operative urgency, whereas Center B sends daily toxicology until a negative test results. The primary outcome was the use of vasoactive agents during the index operation, modeled using logistic regression adjusting for burn severity and hospital days to index operation. Secondary outcomes included death and inpatient complications. A total of 270 patients were included, and there were no significant differences in demographics or burn characteristics between centers. Center A screened once and Center B obtained a median of four screens prior to the surgery. The adjusted OR of requiring vasoactive support intraoperatively was not associated with negative toxicology result (P = .821). Having a body surface area burned >20% conferred a significantly higher risk of vasoactive support (adj. OR 13.42 [3.90-46.23], P < .001). Mortality, number of operations, stroke, and hospital length of stay were similar between cohorts. Comparison between two verified burn centers indicates that waiting until a negative amphetamine toxicology result does not impact intraoperative management or subsequent burn outcomes. Serial toxicology tests are unnecessary to guide operative timing of burn patients with amphetamine use.

Indexed as

BurnsAmphetamineHospitalizationHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesAmphetamineamphetamineanesthesiaburncocainemethamphetaminesafetysurgery

Identifiers

PMID37875155
PMCPMC11514485
OpenAlexW4387931860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.