Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875136›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

The groundnut improvement network for Africa (GINA) germplasm collection: a unique genetic resource for breeding and gene discovery.

Soukeye Conde, Jean-François Rami, David K Okello, Aissatou Sambou, Amade Muitia, Richard Oteng-Frimpong, Lutangu Makweti, Dramane Sako, Issa Faye, Justus Chintu and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Soukeye CondeISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.
Jean-François RamiUMR AGAP, CIRAD, 34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-3877
David K OkelloNational Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute-Serere, PO Box 56, Kampala, Uganda.
Aissatou SambouISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.
Amade MuitiaMozambique Agricultural Research Institute (Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique), Northeast Zonal Centre, Nampula Research Station, PO Box 1922, Nampula, Mozambique.
Richard Oteng-FrimpongGroundnut Improvement Program, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 52, Tamale, Ghana.
Lutangu MakwetiZambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), PO Box 510089, Chipata, Zambia.
Dramane SakoInstitut d'Economie Rurale (IER), Centre Régional de Recherche Agronomique (CRRA), BP 281 Kayes, Mali.
Issa FayeISRA, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Centre National de Recherche Agronomique, BP 53 Bambey, Sénégal.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-7136
Justus ChintuChitedze Agricultural Research Service, PO Box 158, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Adama M CoulibalyInstitut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP 240 Maradi, Niger.
Amos MiningouINERA, CREAF, 01 BP 476 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.
James Y AsibuoCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research-Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI), P.O. Box 3785, Kumasi, Ghana.
Moumouni KonateINERA, DRREA-Ouest, 01 BP 910 Bobo Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Essohouna M BanlaInstitut Togolais de Recherche Agronomique (ITRA), 13BP267 Lome, Togo.
Maguette SeyeISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.
Yvette R DjibouneISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.
Hodo-Abalo TossimISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.
Samba N SyllaF.S.T., Département de B.V., Université Cheikh Anta Diop, BP 5005 Dakar, Senegal.
David HoisingtonFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Peanut, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Josh ClevengerHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9830-9481
Ye ChuInstitute of Plant Breeding Genetics and Genomics and Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8977-7945
Shyam TalluryPlant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, GA 30223, USA.
Peggy Ozias-AkinsInstitute of Plant Breeding Genetics and Genomics and Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA.
Daniel FoncekaISRA, Centre d'Etudes Régional pour l'Amélioration de l'Adaptation à la Sécheresse, CERAAS-Route de Khombole, Thiès BP 3320, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0003-1570-6877

Funding

United States Agency for International Development 7200AA 18CA00003University of GeorgiaU.S. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Peanut
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated peanut or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a grain legume grown in many developing countries by smallholder farmers for food, feed, and/or income. The speciation of the cultivated species, that involved polyploidization followed by domestication, greatly reduced its variability at the DNA level. Mobilizing peanut diversity is a prerequisite for any breeding program for overcoming the main constraints that plague production and for increasing yield in farmer fields. In this study, the Groundnut Improvement Network for Africa assembled a collection of 1,049 peanut breeding lines, varieties, and landraces from 9 countries in Africa. The collection was genotyped with the Axiom_Arachis2 48K SNP array and 8,229 polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were used to analyze the genetic structure of this collection and quantify the level of genetic diversity in each breeding program. A supervised model was developed using dapc to unambiguously assign 542, 35, and 172 genotypes to the Spanish, Valencia, and Virginia market types, respectively. Distance-based clustering of the collection showed a clear grouping structure according to subspecies and market types, with 73% of the genotypes classified as fastigiata and 27% as hypogaea subspecies. Using STRUCTURE, the global structuration was confirmed and showed that, at a minimum membership of 0.8, 76% of the varieties that were not assigned by dapc were actually admixed. This was particularly the case of most of the genotype of the Valencia subgroup that exhibited admixed genetic heritage. The results also showed that the geographic origin (i.e. East, Southern, and West Africa) did not strongly explain the genetic structure. The gene diversity managed by each breeding program, measured by the expected heterozygosity, ranged from 0.25 to 0.39, with the Niger breeding program having the lowest diversity mainly because only lines that belong to the fastigiata subspecies are used in this program. Finally, we developed a core collection composed of 300 accessions based on breeding traits and genetic diversity. This collection, which is composed of 205 genotypes of fastigiata subspecies (158 Spanish and 47 Valencia) and 95 genotypes of hypogaea subspecies (all Virginia), improves the genetic diversity of each individual breeding program and is, therefore, a unique resource for allele mining and breeding.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPlant BreedingAfricaArachisGenetic Association StudiesPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidebreedingcore collectiongenotypinggermplasm diversitygroundnut improvementnetwork

Identifiers

PMID37875136
PMCPMC10755195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.