Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37874839›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Identifying key features of digital resources used during online science practicals.

Vanda Janštová, Petr Novotný, Irena Chlebounová, Fina Guitart, Ester Forne, Montserrat Tortosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanda JanštováDepartment of Biology Education, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5950-5738
Petr NovotnýDepartment of Biology Education, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-6278
Irena ChlebounováDepartment of Biology Education, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-8683
Fina GuitartCESIRE Department of Education, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain.
Ester ForneCESIRE Department of Education, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain.
Montserrat TortosaINS Sabadell, Juvenal, Sabadell, Spain.
Charles University · CZGeneralitat de Catalunya · ESDeleted Institution

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As in our everyday lives, we use digital elements as part of formal and informal education. To serve their educational purpose well, systematic research is desirable to identify and measure their characteristics. This study focuses on science practicals, which are complex and vary in organizational settings and specific arrangements, including usage of digital elements. We describe the digital resources on which the online instruction of science practicals during the COVID-19 forced lockdowns was built, and their key characteristics were identified. Data were collected from science teachers in Slovakia, Czechia, Slovenia, France, and Spain. The teachers shared the web resources they used and that they would recommend, together with a description of the resources. We recorded 89 inputs representing 50 unique resources. Teachers preferred free resources, mostly for knowledge revision, and newly discovered 36% of them due to forced distant teaching. The best evaluated resources were those supporting interaction (especially among peers), focused on teaching subjects and/or ICT, ready to use, and with a clear structure. The resource most frequently mentioned and used in more than half of the countries was PhET (Interactive Simulations for Science and Math) which provides free simulations of scientific principles. Other characteristics mentioned in the literature (e.g., supporting creativity and independent solving, connecting different levels of organization, authenticity, flexibility) were not that important for the overall rating.

Indexed as

Educational PersonnelEducation, DistanceCreativityEducational StatusFranceHumans

Identifiers

PMID37874839
PMCPMC10597498
OpenAlexW4387902558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.