Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37874820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Associations between smokers' knowledge of causes of smoking harm and related beliefs and behaviors: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Bill King, Ron Borland, Michael Le Grande, Destiny Diaz, Richard O'Connor, Katherine East, Eve Taylor, Coral Gartner, Hua-Hie Yong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour, and Nicotine Descriptors Among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bill KingMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ron BorlandMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael Le GrandeMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-6131
Destiny DiazRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Richard O'ConnorRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Katherine EastDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, National Addiction Centre, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
Eve TaylorDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, National Addiction Centre, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-4760
Coral GartnerFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-8035
Hua-Hie YongSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost smokers know that smoking is harmful to health, but less is known about their understanding of what causes the harms. The primary aim was to examine smokers' perceptions of the relative contributions to smoking-related morbidity from combustion products, nicotine, other substances present in unburned tobacco, and additives. A secondary aim was to evaluate the association of these perceptions with nicotine vaping product use intentions, and quitting motivation/intentions.

methodsParticipants were current smokers and recent ex-smokers from Australia, Canada, England and the United States (N = 12,904, including 8511 daily smokers), surveyed in the 2018 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Respondents reported on how much they thought combustion products, nicotine, chemicals in the tobacco and additives in cigarettes contribute to smoking-related morbidity (none/very little; some but less than half; around half; more than half; all or nearly all of it; don't know).

resultsOverall, 4% of participants provided estimates for all four component causes that fell within the ranges classified correct, with younger respondents and those from England most likely to be correct. Respondents who rated combustion as clearly more important than nicotine in causing harm (25%) were the least likely to be smoking daily and more likely to have quit and/or to be vaping. Among daily smokers, all four cause estimates were independently related to overall health worry and extent of wanting to quit, but the relative rating of combustion compared to nicotine did not add to prediction. Those who answered 'don't know' to the sources of harm questions and those suggesting very little harm were consistently least interested in quitting.

conclusionsMost smokers' knowledge of specific causes of harm is currently inadequate and could impact their informed decision-making ability.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAttitude to HealthHealth SurveysHumansNicotineSmokersSmokingTobacco ControlUnited StatesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID37874820
PMCPMC10597481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.