ArticleNeurology and therapy2024
Recognition and Practice of Hypopituitarism After Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Japan: A Survey.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic Central Adrenal Insufficiency in a Patient With Remote Traumatic Brain Injury and an Apparently Adequate Standard-Dose ACTH Response: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Endocrine dysfunction post-traumatic brain injury: challenges and therapeutic approaches.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Review
- Knowledge and attitudes toward mild traumatic brain injury among patients and family members.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are at a high risk of hypopituitarism, and should benefit from early diagnosis and management. However, data on awareness, attitudes, and practices of physicians treating hypopituitarism post-TBI/SAH are limited. The objectives of this study were to gain an understanding of the awareness of Japanese neurosurgeons and endocrinologists towards hypopituitarism post-TBI/SAH and the need for pituitary function assessments in these patients; and to assess the practices and perspectives of these specialists on screening patients with this condition.
methodsAn observational, cross-sectional study was performed that included a Web-based survey of practicing neurosurgeons managing ≥ 1 new patients with TBI/SAH per year or endocrinologists with ≥ 1 new patients per year with a history of TBI/SAH.
resultsOf the 316 respondents (201 neurosurgeons [male, 95.5%]; 115 endocrinologists [male, 77.4%]), 75.6% of neurosurgeons and 81.7% of endocrinologists were aware of the probable occurrence of hypopituitarism post-TBI/SAH, and 79% neurosurgeons and 93.8% endocrinologists considered pituitary function impairment after TBI/SAH to be either very important or important. Hypopituitarism after TBI/SAH was recognized as an important concern by both neurosurgeons (79%) and endocrinologists (93.8%). Although many respondents agreed that such patients remain undiagnosed and untreated, pituitary function assessment post-TBI/SAH has only been performed to a limited extent. The awareness that post-TBI/SAH hypopituitarism is often transient and can progress over several weeks or months was lower in neurosurgeons (46.8%) than in endocrinologists (66.1%).
conclusionsThe level of awareness of hypopituitarism post-TBI/SAH was lower among Japanese neurosurgeons than among endocrinologists. Educational programs and detailed guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of hypopituitarism post-TBI/SAH are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.