Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37874372›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2023

Non-celestial polarization vision in arthropods.

Mathias F Wernet, Nicholas W Roberts, Gregor Belušič

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mathias F WernetDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Chemie and PharmazieKönigin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-2654
Nicholas W RobertsEcology of Vision Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4540-6683
Gregor BelušičBiotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, University of Ljubljana, Večna Pot 111, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Gregor.belusic@bf.uni-lj.si.ORCID 0000-0003-3571-1948
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-7005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most insects can detect the pattern of polarized light in the sky with the dorsal rim area in their compound eyes and use this visual information to navigate in their environment by means of 'celestial' polarization vision. 'Non-celestial polarization vision', in contrast, refers to the ability of arthropods to analyze polarized light by means of the 'main' retina, excluding the dorsal rim area. The ability of using the main retina for polarization vision has been attracting sporadic, but steady attention during the last decade. This special issue of the Journal of Comparative Physiology A presents recent developments with a collection of seven original research articles, addressing different aspects of non-celestial polarization vision in crustaceans and insects. The contributions cover different sources of linearly polarized light in nature, the underlying retinal and neural mechanisms of object detection using polarization vision and the behavioral responses of arthropods to polarized reflections from water.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsInsectaLightRetinaVision, OcularAngle of polarizationCompound eyeContrastDegree of polarizationMicrovillar photoreceptorPolarization vision

Identifiers

PMID37874372
OpenAlexW4387893487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.