ArticleUrolithiasis2023
Case series and literature review of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in Chinese patients.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in Japan.Urolithiasis · 2026Review
- Natural History of Advanced Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: A Retrospective Study.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Primary hyperoxaluria: insights into its clinical presentation, genetic mutations, and transplantation outcomes in a pediatric population in a tertiary care center.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Effect of the allelic background on the phenotype of primary hyperoxaluria type I.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2025Review
- Mutation Characteristics of Primary Hyperoxaluria in the Chinese Population and Current International Diagnosis and Treatment Status.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Primary Hyperoxaluria: Traditional Management Defied by the Rise of Novel Molecular Drugs.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Based on the single-center case reports and all reported patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) in China, this study discussed the clinical and genetic characteristics of this disease retrospectively. We reported and validated a novel genetic variation c.302 T > G: the clinical phenotypes of the two siblings were similar, in which both had onset in infancy, mainly manifested as renal insufficiency, and died within 6 months out of end-stage renal disease. The literature review is the first to summarize the Chinese patients with PH1 up to now. Forty-eight Chinese patients were included, containing 7 adults and 41 children. The median onset age was 51 months, and the ratio of male to female was 2.69:1. It showed a poor prognosis: 51.1% of Chinese primary hyperoxaluria type 1 patients suffered from end-stage renal disease, and 38.9% of patients died. Urolithiasis was the most common clinical manifestation both in adults and children, while infant-onset patients generally presented with renal insufficiency and had a higher mortality of 75.0%. One hundred and forty-nine AGXT mutant alleles are currently known in the Chinese population, c.33dupC and c.815_816insGA were the most common AGXT genes, accounting for 12.0% and 10.1% of allele frequencies, respectively. The exons 1, 2, 6, and 8 were the most common locations of gene variants, accounting for 78% of all variants, which will be promising targets of DNA sequencing for primary hyperoxaluria type 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.