Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873555›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2023

Enpatoran in COVID-19 pneumonia: Safety and efficacy results from a phase II randomized trial.

John E McKinnon, Joel Santiaguel, Claudia Murta de Oliveira, Dongzi Yu, Mukhy Khursheed, Flavie Moreau, Lena Klopp-Schulze, Jamie Shaw, Sanjeev Roy, Amy H Kao and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04448756 (A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M5049 in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04448756 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M5049 in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19 Pneumonia (ANEMONE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled149ConditionsCoronavirus Disease 2019ArmsM5049, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Immunity and Coagulation in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

John E McKinnonDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3916-4021
Joel SantiaguelDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Claudia Murta de OliveiraAmbulatório de Pesquisa Clínica, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Dongzi YuGlobal Clinical Development, EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Mukhy KhursheedGlobal Patient Safety, Merck Serono Ltd. Feltham, UK, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Flavie MoreauGlobal Biostatistics, EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Lena Klopp-SchulzeTranslational Medicine, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Jamie ShawTranslational Medicine, EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Sanjeev RoyGlobal Clinical Development, Ares Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Amy H KaoResearch Unit - Neuroscience & Immunology, EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
ANEMONE Study Team
Merck (Germany) · DEOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMerck Serono (Italy) · ITUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enpatoran is a selective inhibitor of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) that potentially targets pro-inflammatory pathways induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A phase II study conducted in Brazil, the Philippines, and the USA during the early pandemic phase assessed the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04448756). A total of 149 patients, who scored 4 on the World Health Organization's (WHO) 9-point ordinal severity scale, were randomized 1:1:1 and received enpatoran 50 mg (n = 54) or 100 mg (n = 46), or placebo (n = 49) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days plus standard of care. The primary objectives were safety and time to recovery (WHO 9-point scale ≤3). Clinical deterioration (WHO 9-point scale ≥ 5) was a key secondary objective. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across groups (56.5%-63.0%). Treatment-related TEAEs were numerically higher with enpatoran 50 mg (14.8%) than 100 mg (10.9%) or placebo (8.2%). Serious TEAEs were numerically lower with enpatoran (50 mg 9.3%, 100 mg 2.2%) than placebo (18.4%). The primary efficacy objective was not met; median time to recovery was 3.4-3.9 days across groups, with placebo-treated patients recovering on average faster than anticipated. Clinical deterioration event-free rates up to Day 7 were 90.6%, 95.6%, and 81.6% with enpatoran 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Enpatoran was well tolerated by patients acutely ill and hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Positive signals in some secondary end points suggested potential beneficial effects, supporting further evaluation of enpatoran in patients with hyperinflammation due to infection or autoimmunity.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationCOVID-19HumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID37873555
PMCPMC10719456
OpenAlexW4387893173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.