Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873497›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2023

European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.

R Thomas Zoeller, Linda S Birnbaum, Terrence J Collins, Jerrold Heindel, Patricia A Hunt, Taisen Iguchi, Andreas Kortenkamp, John Peterson Myers, Frederick S Vom Saal, Carlos Sonnenschein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Endocrine disruptors, obesity, and metabolic syndrome.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R Thomas ZoellerDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-2658
Linda S BirnbaumScholar in Residence, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-5658
Terrence J CollinsTeresa Heinz Professor of Green Chemistry, and Director, Institute for Green Science, Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-9184
Jerrold HeindelHEEDS, Environmental Health News, Charlotte, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-6523
Patricia A HuntSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-1853
Taisen IguchiGraduate School of Nanobioscience, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0027, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-0704
Andreas KortenkampCentre for Pollution Research and Policy, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9729
John Peterson MyersEnvironmental Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-4101
Frederick S Vom SaalDivision of Biological Sciences, The University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-3264
Carlos SonnenscheinCentre Cavaillès, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-6423
Ana M SotoCentre Cavaillès, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0774-3742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has revised their estimate of the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) and, as a result, have recommended reducing the tolerable daily intake (TDI) by 20 000-fold. This would essentially ban the use of BPA in food packaging such as can liners, plastic food containers, and in consumer products. To come to this conclusion, EFSA used a systematic approach according to a pre-established protocol and included all guideline and nonguideline studies in their analysis. They found that Th-17 immune cells increased with very low exposure to BPA and used this endpoint to revise the TDI to be human health protective. A number of regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have written formal disagreements with several elements of EFSA's proposal. The European Commission will now decide whether to accept EFSA's recommendation over the objections of EMA. If the Commission accepts EFSA's recommendation, it will be a landmark action using knowledge acquired through independent scientific studies focused on biomarkers of chronic disease to protect human health. The goal of this Perspective is to clearly articulate the monumental nature of this debate and decision and to explain what is at stake. Our perspective is that the weight of evidence clearly supports EFSA's proposal to reduce the TDI by 20 000-fold.

Indexed as

bisphenol ABPAEDCsendocrine disrupting chemicalsEuropean Food Safety AuthorityEuropean Medicines Agencyrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37873497
PMCPMC10590640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.