Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873433›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.

Matteo Alleman, Matthew Panichello, Timothy J Buschman, W Jeffrey Johnston

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo AllemanCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience.
Matthew PanichelloPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Timothy J BuschmanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
W Jeffrey JohnstonCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience.
Center for Theoretical Physics · PLPrinceton University · US

Funding

Core Research Computing FacilityG20RR030893 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PURDY, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$10.0M
ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCET32NS064929 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Laurence F. Abbott, Roudabeh Behnia · 2009 to 2026
$2.9M
Understanding the Network Mechanisms that Control Working MemoryR01MH115042 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BUSCHMAN, TIMOTHY J. · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS G20 RR030893NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115042NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When making decisions in a cluttered world, humans and other animals often have to hold multiple items in memory at once - such as the different items on a shopping list. Psychophysical experiments in humans and other animals have shown remembered stimuli can sometimes become confused, with participants reporting chimeric stimuli composed of features from different stimuli. In particular, subjects will often make "swap errors" where they misattribute a feature from one object as belonging to another object. While swap errors have been described behaviorally, their neural mechanisms are unknown. Here, we elucidate these neural mechanisms through trial-by-trial analysis of neural population recordings from posterior and frontal brain regions while monkeys perform two multi-stimulus working memory tasks. In these tasks, monkeys were cued to report the color of an item that either was previously shown at a corresponding location (requiring selection from working memory) or will be shown at the corresponding location (requiring attention to a position). Animals made swap errors in both tasks. In the neural data, we find evidence that the neural correlates of swap errors emerged when correctly remembered information is selected incorrectly from working memory. This led to a representation of the distractor color as if it were the target color, underlying the eventual swap error. We did not find consistent evidence that swap errors arose from misinterpretation of the cue or errors during encoding or storage in working memory. These results suggest an alternative to established views on the neural origins of swap errors, and highlight selection from and manipulation in working memory as crucial - yet surprisingly brittle - neural processes.

Identifiers

PMID37873433
PMCPMC10592761
OpenAlexW4387477216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.