ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
circulating tumor DNA in the immediate post-operative setting.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor cells: indicators of cancer progression, plasticity and utility for therapies.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as an accurate real-time biomarker of disease status across most solid tumor types. Most studies evaluating the utility of ctDNA have focused on time points weeks to months after surgery, which for many cancer types, is significantly later than decision-making time points for adjuvant treatment. In this systematic review, we summarize the state of the literature on the feasibility of using ctDNA as a biomarker in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: We performed a systematic review evaluating the early kinetics, defined here as three days, of ctDNA in patients who underwent curative-intent surgery across several cancer types. Results: Among the 2057 studies identified, we evaluated eight cohort studies with ctDNA levels measured within the first three days after surgery. Across six different cancer types, all studies showed an increased risk of cancer recurrence in patients with a positive early postoperative ctDNA level. Discussion: While ctDNA clearance kinetics appear to vary based on tumor type, across all studies- detectable ctDNA after surgery was predictive of recurrence, suggesting early postoperative timepoints could be feasibly used for determining minimal residual disease. However, larger studies need to be performed to better understand the precise kinetics of ctDNA clearance across different cancer types as well as to determine optimal postoperative time points. Synopsis: This systematic review analyzed the use of ctDNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease detection in the early postoperative setting and found that ctDNA detection within three days after surgery is associated with an increased risk of recurrence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.