ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Self-supervised segmentation and characterization of fiber bundles in anatomic tracing data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anatomic tracing is the gold standard tool for delineating brain connections and for validating more recently developed imaging approaches such as diffusion MRI tractography. A key step in the analysis of data from tracer experiments is the careful, manual charting of fiber trajectories on histological sections. This is a very time-consuming process, which limits the amount of annotated tracer data that are available for validation studies. Thus, there is a need to accelerate this process by developing a method for computer-assisted segmentation. Such a method must be robust to the common artifacts in tracer data, including variations in the intensity of stained axons and background, as well as spatial distortions introduced by sectioning and mounting the tissue. The method should also achieve satisfactory performance using limited manually charted data for training. Here we propose the first deep-learning method, with a self-supervised loss function, for segmentation of fiber bundles on histological sections from macaque brains that have received tracer injections. We address the limited availability of manual labels with a semi-supervised training technique that takes advantage of unlabeled data to improve performance. We also introduce anatomic and across-section continuity constraints to improve accuracy. We show that our method can be trained on manually charted sections from a single case and segment unseen sections from different cases, with a true positive rate of ~0.80. We further demonstrate the utility of our method by quantifying the density of fiber bundles as they travel through different white-matter pathways. We show that fiber bundles originating in the same injection site have different levels of density when they travel through different pathways, a finding that can have implications for microstructure-informed tractography methods. The code for our method is available at https://github.com/v-sundaresan/fiberbundle_seg_tracing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.