ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Shifts in attention drive context-dependent subspace encoding in anterior cingulate cortex during decision making.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Attention is a cognitive faculty that selects part of a larger set of percepts, driven by cues such as stimulus saliency, internal goals or priors. The enhancement of the attended representation and inhibition of distractors have been proposed as potential neural mechanisms driving this selection process. Yet, how attention operates when the cue has to be internally constructed from conflicting stimuli, decision rules, and reward contingencies, is less understood. Here we recorded from populations of neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), an area implicated in ongoing error monitoring and correction during decision conflicts, in a challenging attention-shifting task. In this task, mice had to attend to the rewarded modality when presented identical auditory and visual stimuli in two contexts without direct external cues. In the ACC, the irrelevant stimulus continuously became less decodable than the relevant stimulus as the trial progressed to the decision point. This contrasted strongly with our previous findings in V1 where both relevant and irrelevant stimuli were equally decodable throughout the trial. Using analytical tools and a recurrent neural network (RNN) model, we found that the linearly independent representation of stimulus modalities in ACC was well suited to context-gated suppression of a stimulus modality. We demonstrated that the feedback structure of lateral connections in the RNN consisted of excitatory interactions between cell ensembles representing the same modality and mutual inhibition between cell ensembles representing distinct stimulus modalities. Using this RNN model showing signatures of context-gated suppression, we predicted that the level of contextual modulation of individual neurons should be correlated with their relative responsiveness to the two stimulus modalities used in the task. We verified this prediction in recordings from ACC neurons but not from recordings from V1 neurons. Therefore, ACC effectively operates on low-dimensional neuronal subspaces to combine stimulus related information with internal cues to drive actions under conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.