Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873156›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Scenario Design for Infectious Disease Projections: Integrating Concepts from Decision Analysis and Experimental Design.

Michael C Runge, Katriona Shea, Emily Howerton, Katie Yan, Harry Hochheiser, Erik Rosenstrom, William J M Probert, Rebecca Borchering, Madhav V Marathe, Bryan Lewis and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael C RungeU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Patuxent Research Refuge, Laurel, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8081-536X
Katriona SheaThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-8248
Emily HowertonThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0639-3728
Katie YanThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-504X
Harry HochheiserUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-9982
Erik RosenstromNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-0559
William J M ProbertUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-759X
Rebecca BorcheringThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4309-2913
Madhav V MaratheUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-0658
Bryan LewisUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-6082
Srinivasan VenkatramananUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-8692
Shaun TrueloveJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0538-0607
Justin LesslerThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9741-8109
Cécile ViboudFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-4711

Funding

MIDAS Coordination CenterU24GM132013 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOCHHEISER, HARRY S · 2019 to 2023
$8.1M
Merging machine learning and mechanistic models to improve prediction and inference in emerging epidemicsR01GM140564 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EDWARDS, JESSIE, LESSLER, JUSTIN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140564NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM132013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across many fields, scenario modeling has become an important tool for exploring long-term projections and how they might depend on potential interventions and critical uncertainties, with relevance to both decision makers and scientists. In the past decade, and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, the field of epidemiology has seen substantial growth in the use of scenario projections. Multiple scenarios are often projected at the same time, allowing important comparisons that can guide the choice of intervention, the prioritization of research topics, or public communication. The design of the scenarios is central to their ability to inform important questions. In this paper, we draw on the fields of decision analysis and statistical design of experiments to propose a framework for scenario design in epidemiology, with relevance also to other fields. We identify six different fundamental purposes for scenario designs (decision making, sensitivity analysis, value of information, situational awareness, horizon scanning, and forecasting) and discuss how those purposes guide the structure of scenarios. We discuss other aspects of the content and process of scenario design, broadly for all settings and specifically for multi-model ensemble projections. As an illustrative case study, we examine the first 17 rounds of scenarios from the U.S. COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub, then reflect on future advancements that could improve the design of scenarios in epidemiological settings.

Indexed as

design of experimentsmulti-model projectionsScenario modelingsensitivity analysisvalue of information

Identifiers

PMID37873156
PMCPMC10592999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.