Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873137›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Single-fly assemblies fill major phylogenomic gaps across the Drosophilidae Tree of Life.

Bernard Y Kim, Hannah R Gellert, Samuel H Church, Anton Suvorov, Sean S Anderson, Olga Barmina, Sofia G Beskid, Aaron A Comeault, K Nicole Crown, Sarah E Diamond and 28 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Bernard Y KimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Hannah R GellertDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Samuel H ChurchDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, USA.
Anton SuvorovDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, USA.
Sean S AndersonDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA.
Olga BarminaDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, USA.
Sofia G BeskidDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Aaron A ComeaultSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, UK.
K Nicole CrownDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Sarah E DiamondDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Steve DorusCenter for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, USA.
Takako FujichikaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan.
James A HemkerDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Jan HrcekInstitute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Czechia.
Maaria KankareDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Toru KatohDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hokkaido University, Japan.
Karl N MagnaccaHawaii Invertebrate Program, Division of Forestry & Wildlife, State of Hawaii, USA.
Ryan A MartinDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Teruyuki MatsunagaDepartment of Complexity Science and Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Matthew J MedeirosPacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawai'i, Mānoa, USA.
Danny E MillerDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, USA.
Scott PitnickCenter for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, USA.
Sara SimoniDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Tessa E SteenwinkelBaylor College of Medicine, USA.
Michele SchifferDaintree Rainforest Observatory, James Cook University, Australia.
Zeeshan A SyedCenter for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, USA.
Aya TakahashiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan.
Kevin H-C WeiDepartment of Zoology, The University of British Columbia.
Tsuya YokoyamaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Michael B EisenDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of California Berkeley, United States.
Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, USA.
Daniel MatuteDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA.
Darren J ObbardInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Patrick M O'GradyDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, USA.
Donald K PriceSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.
Masanori J TodaHokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Japan.
Thomas WernerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA.
Dmitri A PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, USA.
Stanford University · USCase Western Reserve University · USSyracuse University · USHokkaido University · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JPUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBangor University · GBBaylor College of Medicine · USChan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco · USCornell University · USCzech Academy of Sciences · CZHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USJames Cook University · AUMichigan Technological University · USThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Genomics of rapid adaptation in the lab and in the wildR35GM118165 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Dmitri Petrov · 2016 to 2026
$8.3M
Molecular Genetics of Evolutionary InnovationsR35GM122592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARTYOM KOPP · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Drivers and consequences of introgression in evolutionR35GM148244 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Daniel Matute · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Chromosome structural variants in meiosis - Equipment supplementR35GM137834 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CROWN, KIMBERLY NICOLE · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Molecular and evolutionary characterization of male recombination and its reversal in the D. nasuta species subgroupK99GM137041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WEI, HENG CHIN KEVIN · 2020 to 2021
$185k
A comparative population genomic approach for high-resolution inference of natural selection in fruit fliesF32GM135998 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, BERNARD YOUNGSOO · 2020 to 2021
$131k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM135998NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM137041NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118165NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122592NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137834NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-read sequencing is driving rapid progress in genome assembly across all major groups of life, including species of the family Drosophilidae, a longtime model system for genetics, genomics, and evolution. We previously developed a cost-effective hybrid Oxford Nanopore (ONT) long-read and Illumina short-read sequencing approach and used it to assemble 101 drosophilid genomes from laboratory cultures, greatly increasing the number of genome assemblies for this taxonomic group. The next major challenge is to address the laboratory culture bias in taxon sampling by sequencing genomes of species that cannot easily be reared in the lab. Here, we build upon our previous methods to perform amplification-free ONT sequencing of single wild flies obtained either directly from the field or from ethanol-preserved specimens in museum collections, greatly improving the representation of lesser studied drosophilid taxa in whole-genome data. Using Illumina Novaseq X Plus and ONT P2 sequencers with R10.4.1 chemistry, we set a new benchmark for inexpensive hybrid genome assembly at US $150 per genome while assembling genomes from as little as 35 ng of genomic DNA from a single fly. We present 183 new genome assemblies for 179 species as a resource for drosophilid systematics, phylogenetics, and comparative genomics. Of these genomes, 62 are from pooled lab strains and 121 from single adult flies. Despite the sample limitations of working with small insects, most single-fly diploid assemblies are comparable in contiguity (>1Mb contig N50), completeness (>98% complete dipteran BUSCOs), and accuracy (>QV40 genome-wide with ONT R10.4.1) to assemblies from inbred lines. We present a well-resolved multi-locus phylogeny for 360 drosophilid and 4 outgroup species encompassing all publicly available (as of August 2023) genomes for this group. Finally, we present a Progressive Cactus whole-genome, reference-free alignment built from a subset of 298 suitably high-quality drosophilid genomes. The new assemblies and alignment, along with updated laboratory protocols and computational pipelines, are released as an open resource and as a tool for studying evolution at the scale of an entire insect family.

Identifiers

PMID37873137
PMCPMC10592941
OpenAlexW4387307874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.