Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873063›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023

Assessing Leachable Cytotoxicity of 3D-Printed Polymers and Facile Detoxification Methods.

Venkatakrishnan Rengarajan, Angela Clyde, Jefferson Pontsler, Jonathan Valiente, Adreann Peel, Yu Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkatakrishnan RengarajanDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-170X
Angela ClydeDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Jefferson PontslerDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Jonathan ValienteDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Adreann PeelDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Yu HuangDepartment of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1859-3380
Utah State University · US

Funding

Uncover Spatial-Constraint Related Morphome Using Tissue-on-a-Chip Platform and Data-Driven Mathematical ModelingR35GM143194 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, YU · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Unravel the cellular biophysical dynamics of spatial constraint-induced membrane blebbing and 3D migration using a microfluidic platform and data-driven mathematical modelingR15GM132877 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, YU · 2019 to 2021
$486k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM132877NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of polymers is gaining momentum in health care industries by providing rapid 3D printing of customizable designs. Yet, little is explored about the cytotoxicity of leachable toxins that the 3D printing process introduced into the final product. We studied three printable materials, which have various mechanical properties and are widely used in stereolithography 3D printing. We evaluated the cytotoxicity of these materials through exposing two fibroblast cell lines (human and mouse derived) to the 3D-printed parts, using overlay indirect contact assays. All the 3D-printed parts were measured toxic to the cells in a leachable manner, with flexible materials more toxic than rigid materials. Furthermore, we attempted to reduce the toxicity of the 3D-printed material by employing three treatment methods (further curing, passivation coating, and Soxhlet solvent extraction). The Soxhlet solvent extraction method was the most effective in removing the leachable toxins, resulting in the eradication of the material's toxicity. Passivation coating and further curing showed moderate and little detoxification, respectively. Additionally, mechanical testing of the materials treated with extraction methods revealed no significant impacts on its mechanical performances. As leachable toxins are broadly present in 3D-printed polymers, our cytotoxicity evaluation and reduction methods could aid in extending the selections of biocompatible materials and pave the way for the translational use of 3D printing.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbiocompatibilitycytotoxicitydelaminationfurther curingpassivationSoxhlet extractionstereolithography

Identifiers

PMID37873063
PMCPMC10593418
OpenAlexW4210359150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.