ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023
Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). Methods: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Results: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. Conclusion: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.