Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37873024›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2023

Perceptions and Preoccupations of Patients and Physicians Regarding Use of Medical Cannabis as an Intervention Against Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Results from a Qualitative Study.

Lise Poisblaud, Edeltraut Kröger, Nathalie Jauvin, Julie Pelletier-Jacob, Richard E Bélanger, Guillaume Foldes-Busque, Michèle Aubin, Pierre Pluye, Laurence Guillaumie, Malek Amiri and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lise PoisblaudCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSSCN), Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Edeltraut KrögerCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSSCN), Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-3979
Nathalie JauvinInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Julie Pelletier-JacobCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSSCN), Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Richard E BélangerCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Guillaume Foldes-BusqueSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Michèle AubinCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSSCN), Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-6164
Pierre PluyeFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Laurence GuillaumieFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Malek AmiriFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre DagenaisFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Clermont E DionneCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSSCN), Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-5573
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAUniversité Laval · CACentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval · CACentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Explore perceptions and preoccupations regarding use of medical cannabis against chronic musculoskeletal pain, among patients and physicians. Design: Qualitative study using interviews with patients and physicians, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Setting: The study was conducted in Quebec, Canada, in spring 2020. Subjects: We included 27 adult patients and 11 physicians (GPs, anesthesiologists, psychiatrists, and a rheumatologist); the mean age of patients was 48.2 years; 59.3% of patients and 36.4% of physicians were women; 59.3% of patients used no medical cannabis at the time of study; 45.5% of physicians had never authorized it. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed and for the qualitative analysis codes were developed in a hybrid, inductive and deductive approach. Guided by the TPB, facilitators and barriers, perceived benefits and harms, and perceived norms that may influence cannabis use or authorization were documented. Results: Although medical cannabis is an interesting avenue for the relief of chronic musculoskeletal pain, doctors and patients agreed that it remained a last line option, due to the lack of scientific evidence regarding its safety and efficacy. The norms surrounding medical cannabis also play an important role in the social and professional acceptance of this therapeutic option. Conclusion: Medical cannabis is seen as a last line option among interventions in the management of chronic pain, and attitudes and prior experiences play a role in the decision to use it. Study results may contribute to improved shared decision making between patients and physicians regarding this option.

Indexed as

chronic musculoskeletal painlack of knowledgemedical cannabisqualitative studystigmatheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID37873024
PMCPMC10590559
OpenAlexW4387745366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.