Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872986›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2023

A review of emergent intelligent systems for the detection of Parkinson's disease.

Samiappan Dhanalakshmi, Ramesh Sai Maanasaa, Ramesh Sai Maalikaa, Ramalingam Senthil

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samiappan DhanalakshmiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203 India.
Ramesh Sai MaanasaaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203 India.
Ramesh Sai MaalikaaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203 India.
Ramalingam SenthilDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203 India.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-8351
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting people worldwide. The PD symptoms are divided into motor and non-motor symptoms. Detection of PD is very crucial and essential. Such challenges can be overcome by applying artificial intelligence to diagnose PD. Many studies have also proposed the implementation of computer-aided diagnosis for the detection of PD. This systematic review comprehensively analyzed all appropriate algorithms for detecting and assessing PD based on the literature from 2012 to 2023 which are conducted as per PRISMA model. This review focused on motor symptoms, namely handwriting dynamics, voice impairments and gait, multimodal features, and brain observation using single photon emission computed tomography, magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram signals. The significant challenges are critically analyzed, and appropriate recommendations are provided. The critical discussion of this review article can be helpful in today's PD community in such a way that it allows clinicians to provide proper treatment and timely medication.

Indexed as

Intelligent algorithmsMachine learningNeural networksNeurodegenerative disorderParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID37872986
PMCPMC10590348
OpenAlexW4386890512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.