Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872965›Full record

ArticleInfant and child development

Qualitative and Quantitative Measures of Joint Attention Development in the First Year of Life: A Scoping Review.

Holly Bradley, Beth A Smith, Rujuta B Wilson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Infant and child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Tactile Initiation of Joint Attention in Autistic Children.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025
    Article
  4. Infant EEG microstate dynamics relate to fine-grained patterns of infant attention during naturalistic play with caregivers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Holly BradleyDivision of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Beth A SmithDivision of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Rujuta B WilsonDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Divisions of Pediatric Neurology and Child Psychiatry, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Quantification of Infant Motor Development to Predict Risk for Neurodevelopmental DisordersK23HD099275 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WILSON, RUJUTA BHATT · 2020 to 2024
$887k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD099275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint attention (JA) is the purposeful coordination of an individual's focus of attention with that of another and begins to develop within the first year of life. Delayed, or atypically developing, JA is an early behavioral sign of many developmental disabilities and so assessing JA in infancy can improve our understanding of trajectories of typical and atypical development. This scoping review identified the most common methods for assessing JA in the first year of life. Methods of JA were divided into qualitative and quantitative categories. Out of an identified 13,898 articles, 106 were selected after a robust search of four databases. Frequent methods used were eye tracking, electroencephalography (EEG), behavioral coding and the Early Social Communication Scale (ECSC). These methods were used to assess JA in typically and atypically developing infants in the first year of life. This study provides a comprehensive review of the past and current state of measurement of JA in the literature, the strengths and limitations of the measures used, and the next steps to consider for researchers interested in investigating JA to strengthen this field going forwards.

Indexed as

infancyJoint attentionmeasuresqualitativequantitativescoping review

Identifiers

PMID37872965
PMCPMC10588805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.