ReviewCureus2023
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic Interventions in Sjögren's Syndrome: A Systematic Review Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In strict accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, our research team conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) to explore the treatment and preventive strategies for Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). Leveraging a meticulous search strategy, we scoured reputable databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. Our analysis zeroed in on 10 seminal articles that met our stringent inclusion criteria, providing a holistic view of the existing treatment landscape for SS, along with emerging diagnostic tools and associated biomarkers indicative of lymphoma risk. From a clinical standpoint, our findings unequivocally highlight the detrimental effects of SS on patients' overall well-being. Of particular interest is the growing body of evidence that underscores the effectiveness of natural remedies and over-the-counter supplements rich in antioxidants as viable therapeutic interventions. Contrary to expectations, no single laboratory marker emerged as highly sensitive for the diagnosis of SS. On a promising note, dental implants have been demonstrated to offer lasting benefits with minimal side effects, emphasizing their potential utility in enhancing the oral health of individuals affected by SS. Given the evolving nature of treatment approaches for SS, our review strongly calls for further investigations. Such research endeavors are imperative for validating the effectiveness of these treatment options, whether they serve as primary or preventive care solutions, with the overarching aim of improving the quality of oral health among those suffering from SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.