ArticleCureus2023
Digital Versus Conventional Teaching of Surgical Pathology: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating the implementation of digital pathology in India.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Enhancing histology education: Iranian medical students' experience with eHistoLab web-application virtual microscopy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Advances in Avian Diagnostic Pathology: Current Trends, Challenges and Future Directions: A Review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the digital method and the conventional method of teaching surgical pathology to medical students.
methodsA prospective case-control study was conducted on second-year students during the period of August 20, 2022, through January 15, 2023. Students, divided into two groups of 45 each, were taught surgical pathology via both conventional and digital methods. Four specimens and four slides were taught in total to the same set of students. A pre-test and a post-test were used to evaluate students' performance and the impact of the teaching method. The answers were analyzed using a paired t-test. In the end, students' responses were obtained regarding their views on a better method of teaching on a Likert scale.
resultsTo study gross pathology, 50.7% of students were in favor of the digital method, and 21% were not in favor. For the microscopic examination of tissues, 56.92% of students were in favor of the digital method, and 15% were not in favor. There was a significant increase in post-test scores (12.54-9.79 = 2.75, p=0.007) when digital methods for teaching surgical pathology were applied.
conclusionThe Likert scale demonstrated that the digital method of teaching surgical pathology not only improved student performance but also resulted in a better understanding of the subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.