ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023
Circulating acyl-CoA-binding protein/diazepam-binding inhibitor in gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular acyl-CoA-binding protein as an independent biomarker of COVID-19 disease severity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP)/diazepam-binding inhibitor has recently been characterized as an endocrine factor affecting energy balance and lipid metabolism. However, regulation of ACBP in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy, as well as postpartum, has not been investigated, so far.
methodsACBP was quantified in 74 women with GDM and 74 healthy, gestational age-matched, pregnant controls using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Furthermore, ACBP was quantified post-partum in 82 women (i.e. 41 women with previous GDM vs. 41 previous control women). ACBP was related to measures of obesity, hypertension, glucose and lipid metabolism, renal function, and inflammation during pregnancy and postpartum.
resultsDuring pregnancy, median [interquartile range] ACBP levels were not significantly different in women with GDM (40.9 [40.0] µg/l) compared to healthy, pregnant controls (29.1 [32.3] µg/l) (p = 0.215). ACBP serum concentrations increased from 30.3 [40.5] µg/l during pregnancy to 59.7 [33.2] µg/l after pregnancy in the entire cohort (p < 0.001). This observed elevation was consistent across both subgroups of women, those with prior GDM and those without. Multivariate analysis revealed that homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function (HOMA2-B) and creatinine positively and independently correlated with serum ACBP after pregnancy, while multivariate analysis during pregnancy showed no significant correlations.
conclusionsCirculating ACBP is not a marker of GDM status, but ACBP is decreased during pregnancy, irrespective of GDM status. Furthermore, ACBP is related to beta cell function and renal markers in women after pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.