Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872541›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Federated causal inference based on real-world observational data sources: application to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness assessment.

Marjan Meurisse, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Javier González-Galindo, Natalia Martínez-Lizaga, Santiago Royo-Sierra, Simon Saldner, Lorenz Dolanski-Aghamanoukjan, Alexander Degelsegger-Marquez, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Nina Van Goethem and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Marjan Meurisse *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium. marjan.meurisse@sciensano.be.
Francisco Estupiñán-Romero *Data science for Health Services and Policy, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Javier González-GalindoData science for Health Services and Policy, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Natalia Martínez-LizagaData science for Health Services and Policy, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Santiago Royo-SierraData science for Health Services and Policy, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Simon SaldnerData Archiving and Networked Services, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lorenz Dolanski-AghamanoukjanInternational Affairs, Policy, Evaluation and Digitalisation, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG), Vienna, Austria.
Alexander Degelsegger-MarquezInternational Affairs, Policy, Evaluation and Digitalisation, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG), Vienna, Austria.
Stian Soiland-ReyesDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nina Van Goethem *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Enrique Bernal-Delgado *Data science for Health Services and Policy, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
BeYond-COVID project
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud · ESGesundheit Österreich · ATRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLSciensano (Belgium) · BEUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCausal inference helps researchers and policy-makers to evaluate public health interventions. When comparing interventions or public health programs by leveraging observational sensitive individual-level data from populations crossing jurisdictional borders, a federated approach (as opposed to a pooling data approach) can be used. Approaching causal inference by re-using routinely collected observational data across different regions in a federated manner, is challenging and guidance is currently lacking. With the aim of filling this gap and allowing a rapid response in the case of a next pandemic, a methodological framework to develop studies attempting causal inference using federated cross-national sensitive observational data, is described and showcased within the European BeYond-COVID project.

methodsA framework for approaching federated causal inference by re-using routinely collected observational data across different regions, based on principles of legal, organizational, semantic and technical interoperability, is proposed. The framework includes step-by-step guidance, from defining a research question, to establishing a causal model, identifying and specifying data requirements in a common data model, generating synthetic data, and developing an interoperable and reproducible analytical pipeline for distributed deployment. The conceptual and instrumental phase of the framework was demonstrated and an analytical pipeline implementing federated causal inference was prototyped using open-source software in preparation for the assessment of real-world effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination in preventing infection in populations spanning different countries, integrating a data quality assessment, imputation of missing values, matching of exposed to unexposed individuals based on confounders identified in the causal model and a survival analysis within the matched population.

resultsThe conceptual and instrumental phase of the proposed methodological framework was successfully demonstrated within the BY-COVID project. Different Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) research objects were produced, such as a study protocol, a data management plan, a common data model, a synthetic dataset and an interoperable analytical pipeline.

conclusionsThe framework provides a systematic approach to address federated cross-national policy-relevant causal research questions based on sensitive population, health and care data in a privacy-preserving and interoperable way. The methodology and derived research objects can be re-used and contribute to pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19CausalityCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesCausal inferenceComparative effectivenessCOVID-19Federated analysisPandemic preparednessReal-world dataVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37872541
PMCPMC10594731
OpenAlexW4387880642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.