ArticleBMC pediatrics2023
Early prediction of need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit using artificial intelligence and electronic health records: a clinical study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and digital technologies transforming neonatal respiratory assessment: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Video-based artificial intelligence for automated neonatal respiratory monitoring.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict Endotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Patients in Real Time.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis Model for Infant Incubator Adverse Events Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation Combined With Dual-Adapter Fine-Tuning: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- A three-factor nomogram predicts the use of invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 h in preterm infants.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- The anesthesiologist's guide to critically assessing machine learning research: a narrative review.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Review
- Development, deployment, and continuous monitoring of a machine learning model to predict respiratory failure in critically ill patients.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: Revolutionizing pediatric emergency care - A narrative review.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory support is crucial for newborns with underdeveloped lung. The clinical outcomes of patients depend on the clinician's ability to recognize the status underlying the presented symptoms and signs. With the increasing number of high-risk infants, artificial intelligence (AI) should be considered as a tool for personalized neonatal care. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is essential in cardiorespiratory care. In this study, we developed deep learning (DL) prediction models for rapid and accurate detection of mechanical ventilation requirements in neonates using electronic health records (EHR).
methodsWe utilized data from the neonatal intensive care unit in a single center, collected between March 3, 2012, and March 4, 2022, including 1,394 patient records used for model development, consisting of 505 and 889 patients with and without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) support, respectively. The proposed model architecture includes feature embedding using feature-wise fully connected (FC) layers, followed by three bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) layers.
resultsA mean gestational age (GA) was 36.61 ± 3.25 weeks, and the mean birth weight was 2,734.01 ± 784.98 g. The IMV group had lower GA, birth weight, and longer hospitalization duration than the non-IMV group (P < 0.05). Our proposed model, tested on a dataset from March 4, 2019, to March 4, 2022. The mean AUROC of our proposed model for IMV support prediction performance demonstrated 0.861 (95%CI, 0.853-0.869). It is superior to conventional approaches, such as newborn early warning score systems (NEWS), Random Forest, and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) with 0.611 (95%CI, 0.600-0.622), 0.837 (95%CI, 0.828-0.845), and 0.0.831 (95%CI, 0.821-0.845), respectively. The highest AUPRC value is shown in the proposed model at 0.327 (95%CI, 0.308-0.347). The proposed model performed more accurate predictions as gestational age decreased. Additionally, the model exhibited the lowest alarm rate while maintaining the same sensitivity level.
conclusionDeep learning approaches can help accurately standardize the prediction of invasive mechanical ventilation for neonatal patients and facilitate advanced neonatal care. The results of predictive, recall, and alarm performances of the proposed model outperformed the other models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.