Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872467›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Deep learning assisted measurement of echocardiographic left heart parameters: improvement in interobserver variability and workflow efficiency.

Victor Mor-Avi, Alexandra Blitz, Marcus Schreckenberg, Karima Addetia, Kalie Kebed, Gregory Scalia, Luigi P Badano, James N Kirkpatrick, Pedro Gutierrez-Fajardo, Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Editor's choice to the December 2023 issue.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Victor Mor-AviUniversity of Chicago Medicine, 5758 S. Maryland Ave., MC 9067, DCAM 5509, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Alexandra BlitzTOMTEC Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany.
Marcus SchreckenbergTOMTEC Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany.
Karima AddetiaUniversity of Chicago Medicine, 5758 S. Maryland Ave., MC 9067, DCAM 5509, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Kalie KebedMinneapolis Heart Institute - Allina Health at United Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Gregory ScaliaGenesis Care, Brisbane, Australia.
Luigi P BadanoIstituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
James N KirkpatrickUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pedro Gutierrez-FajardoHospital de Especialidades San Francisco de Asis, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Ana Clara Tude RodriguesAlbert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Anita SadeghpourMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute/Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Edwin S TucayPhilippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Aldo D PradoCentro Privado de Cardiologia, Tucumán, Argentina.
Wendy TsangToronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kofo O OgunyankinFirst Cardiology Consultants Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
Alexander RossmanithTOMTEC Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany.
Georg SchummersTOMTEC Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany.
Dorottya LaczikTOMTEC Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany.
Federico M AschMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute/Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Roberto M LangUniversity of Chicago Medicine, 5758 S. Maryland Ave., MC 9067, DCAM 5509, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. rlang@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning techniques designed to recognize views and perform measurements are increasingly used to address the need for automation of the interpretation of echocardiographic images. The current study was designed to determine whether a recently developed and validated deep learning (DL) algorithm for automated measurements of echocardiographic parameters of left heart chamber size and function can improve the reproducibility and shorten the analysis time, compared to the conventional methodology. The DL algorithm trained to identify standard views and provide automated measurements of 20 standard parameters, was applied to images obtained in 12 randomly selected echocardiographic studies. The resultant measurements were reviewed and revised as necessary by 10 independent expert readers. The same readers also performed conventional manual measurements, which were averaged and used as the reference standard for the DL-assisted approach with and without the manual revisions. Inter-reader variability was quantified using coefficients of variation, which together with analysis times, were compared between the conventional reads and the DL-assisted approach. The fully automated DL measurements showed good agreement with the reference technique: Bland-Altman biases 0-14% of the measured values. Manual revisions resulted in only minor improvement in accuracy: biases 0-11%. This DL-assisted approach resulted in a 43% decrease in analysis time and less inter-reader variability than the conventional methodology: 2-3 times smaller coefficients of variation. In conclusion, DL-assisted approach to analysis of echocardiographic images can provide accurate left heart measurements with the added benefits of improved reproducibility and time savings, compared to conventional methodology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEchocardiography, Three-DimensionalEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesHumansObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowArtificial intelligenceMachine learningTwo-dimensional echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.