Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872460›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

Mixed Methods Analysis of Telehealth Experience, Satisfaction, and Quality of Care During the COVID Pandemic Among Persons with HIV in Washington, DC.

Shannon K Barth, Kacie J Saulters, Gayle P Balba, Anne K Monroe, Michael A Horberg, Princy N Kumar, Alan E Greenberg, Amanda D Castel, DC Cohort Executive Committee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon K BarthDepartment of Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. sboyer@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-8371
Kacie J SaultersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Capital Region Health, Largo, MD, USA.
Gayle P BalbaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Anne K MonroeDepartment of Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Michael A HorbergKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Princy N KumarGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Alan E GreenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Amanda D CastelDepartment of Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
DC Cohort Executive Committee
Milken Institute · USGeorgetown University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

The DC Cohort: A Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study of People Living with HIV in Washington, DCR24AI152598 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Derryck Castel, Marinella Temprosa · 2020 to 2026
$37.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI152598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe telehealth experiences and quality of HIV care provided to an urban population of people with HIV (PWH) in Washington, DC. We used self-reported survey data from a cohort of PWH in the DC Cohort longitudinal study linked to medical records (October 26, 2020-December 31, 2021). Analyses followed a mixed-methods approach, including prevalence estimates and multivariable logistic regression of telehealth use by demographic and HIV characteristics. We measured primary motivation, modes of engagement, and telehealth satisfaction. Qualitative responses to open-ended questions were coded using collaborative coding. A framework developed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) was applied to the results. Among 978 participants, 69% reported using telehealth for HIV care during the pandemic. High school graduates were less likely to use telehealth compared to those with college education (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48, 0.98). PWH with > 1 co-morbid condition were more likely to use telehealth compared to those without (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02, 1.95). The majority reported satisfaction with telehealth (81%). Qualitative analysis of telehealth satisfaction found that most responses were related to access to care and technology, effectiveness, and patient experience. PWH using telehealth during the pandemic were satisfied with their experience though use differed demographically. Telehealth was used effectively to overcome barriers to care engagement, including transportation, costs, and time. As we transition away from the emergency pandemic responses, it will be important to determine how this technology can be used in the future in an equitable manner to further strengthen HIV care engagement.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsTelemedicineDistrict of ColumbiaHumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsCOVID-19HIV/AIDSTelehealth and medicine

Identifiers

PMID37872460
PMCPMC10923106
OpenAlexW4387867627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.