ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024
Attention modulates perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apparent Talker Variability and Speaking Style Similarity Can Enhance Comprehension of Novel L2-Accented Talkers.Language and speech · 2026Article
- The Impact of Trained Conditions on the Generalization of Learning Gains Following Voice Discrimination Training.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeners readily adapt to variation in non-native-accented speech, learning to disambiguate between talker-specific and accent-based variation. We asked (1) which linguistic and indexical features of the spoken utterance are relevant for this learning to occur and (2) whether task-driven attention to these features affects the extent to which learning generalizes to novel utterances and voices. In two experiments, listeners heard English sentences (Experiment 1) or words (Experiment 2) produced by Spanish-accented talkers during an exposure phase. Listeners' attention was directed to lexical content (transcription), indexical cues (talker identification), or both (transcription + talker identification). In Experiment 1, listeners' test transcription of novel English sentences spoken by Spanish-accented talkers showed generalized perceptual learning to previously unheard voices and utterances for all training conditions. In Experiment 2, generalized learning occurred only in the transcription + talker identification condition, suggesting that attention to both linguistic and indexical cues optimizes listeners' ability to distinguish between individual talker- and group-based variation, especially with the reduced availability of sentence-length prosodic information. Collectively, these findings highlight the role of attentional processes in the encoding of speech input and underscore the interdependency of indexical and lexical characteristics in spoken language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37872434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.