ArticleScientific reports2023
Real-time dual prediction of intradialytic hypotension and hypertension using an explainable deep learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of intradialytic hemodynamic phenotypes using latent profile analysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- MI-Net: a dual-stream feature network based on Mamba-convolutional neural network (CNN) fusion to predict intradialytic hypotension using multimodal data.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Accurate prediction of intradialytic hypo- and hypertension in haemodialysis patients: the dual-attention Transformer model.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nephrology: Current Applications, Emerging Techniques, and Challenges to Clinical Integration.Kidney360 · 2026Review
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Intra-Dialytic Hypotension and the VExUS Assessment in Hospitalized Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cardiorenal medicine · 2026Article
- Intra-Session recurrence in intradialytic hypotension prediction: evaluation implications and recurrence-aware modeling.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of 1.25 vs. 1.5 mmol/L dialysate calcium concentrations on blood pressure variability during hemodialysis: a two-center retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting blood pressure variability in hemodialysis using an explainable boosting machine model.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Prediction of ultrafiltration volume in maintenance hemodialysis patients using an artificial neural network model based on body composition information.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The BestShape artificial intelligence system for real-time prediction of intradialytic hypotension-clinical outcomes after four-year follow-up.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: From Early Detection to Clinical Management of Kidney Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An explainable machine learning model for early warning of hypertensive and hypotensive anomalies in maintenance hemodialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Population-Wide Depression Incidence Forecasting Comparing Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and Vector Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average to Temporal Fusion Transformers: Longitudinal Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and hypertension (IDHTN) are associated with poor outcomes in hemodialysis patients, but a model predicting dual outcomes in real-time has never been developed. Herein, we developed an explainable deep learning model with a sequence-to-sequence-based attention network to predict both of these events simultaneously. We retrieved 302,774 hemodialysis sessions from the electronic health records of 11,110 patients, and these sessions were split into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) datasets through patient randomization. The outcomes were defined when nadir systolic blood pressure (BP) < 90 mmHg (termed IDH-1), a decrease in systolic BP ≥ 20 mmHg and/or a decrease in mean arterial pressure ≥ 10 mmHg (termed IDH-2), or an increase in systolic BP ≥ 10 mmHg (i.e., IDHTN) occurred within 1 h. We developed a temporal fusion transformer (TFT)-based model and compared its performance in the test dataset, including receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curves (AUPRC), with those of other machine learning models, such as recurrent neural network, light gradient boosting machine, random forest, and logistic regression. Among all models, the TFT-based model achieved the highest AUROCs of 0.953 (0.952-0.954), 0.892 (0.891-0.893), and 0.889 (0.888-0.890) in predicting IDH-1, IDH-2, and IDHTN, respectively. The AUPRCs in the TFT-based model for these outcomes were higher than the other models. The factors that contributed the most to the prediction were age and previous session, which were time-invariant variables, as well as systolic BP and elapsed time, which were time-varying variables. The present TFT-based model predicts both IDH and IDHTN in real time and offers explainable variable importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.