ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning approach to monitor inkjet jetting status based on the piezo self-sensing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategic Implementation of Multimaterial Additive Manufacturing: Bridging Research and Real-World Applications.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Attentive ink MLP droplet detection algorithm based on the satellite droplets threshold domain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Transfer of a rational formulation and process development approach for 2D inks for pharmaceutical 2D and 3D printing.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the advantages of inkjet printing in digital manufacturing is the ability to use multiple nozzles simultaneously to improve the productivity of the processes. However, the use of multiple nozzles makes inkjet status monitoring more difficult. The jetting nozzles must be carefully selected to ensure the quality of printed products, which is challenging for most inkjet processes that use multi-nozzles. In this article, we improved inkjet print head monitoring based on self-sensing signals by using machine learning algorithms. Specifically, supervised machine learning models were used to classify nozzle jetting conditions. For this purpose, the self-sensing signals were acquired, and the feature information was extracted for training. A vision algorithm was developed to label the nozzle status for classification. The trained models showed that the classification accuracy is higher than 99.6% when self-sensing signals are used for monitoring. We also proposed a so-called hybrid monitoring method using trained machine learning models, which divides the feature space into three regions based on predicted jetting probability: certain jetting, certain non-jetting, and doubt regions. Then, the nozzles with uncertain status in the doubt region can be verified by jet visualization to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the monitoring process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.