ArticleHeart and vessels2024
Treatment with catheter ablation for patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy caused by atrial fibrillation promises a good prognosis.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- When should bepridil concomitant with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation be discontinued? The importance of left atrial reverse remodeling.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Which Patient Benefits from Guideline-directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure and Rate Control versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation and What are Those Therapies?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Long-term prognosis of pure and impure tachycardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2025Observational
- Maintenance mechanism of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from the activation occurring within the pulmonary vein: analysis using non-contact mapping.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Arrhythmia-Induced Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Improvement in Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Catheter Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Metabolome analysis in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Predictors of Improvement in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation: Systematic Review.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcomes of patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) and the influence of pharmacological treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with AIC after the procedure. Ninety-six patients with AF with a reduced LVEF (LVEF < 50%, 66.7 ± 10.9 years; 72 males) underwent AF ablation. AIC was defined as patients whose LVEF recovered ≥ 50% after catheter ablation (n = 67) and patients whose LVEF remained reduced were defined as non-AIC (n = 29). During a median follow-up of 25 (13-40) months, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with AIC were associated with less frequent cardiovascular death (p = 0.025) and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (p < 0.001) than those without AIC. Freedom from AF recurrence was similar between the two groups (p = 0.47). In multivariate analysis, the LV end-diastolic diameter (p = 0.0002) and the CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.