Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872278›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Electronic nose versus VITEK 2 system for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Ehab I Mohamed, Mohamed S Turkey, Radwa A Meshref, Abeer A Ghazal, Sherine M Shawky, Aliaa G Aboulela

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ehab I MohamedMedical Biophysics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. eimohamed@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-1928
Mohamed S TurkeyMicrobiology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Radwa A MeshrefMedical Equipment Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abeer A GhazalMicrobiology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Sherine M ShawkyMicrobiology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Aliaa G AboulelaMicrobiology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGOctober 6 University · EGPharos University in Alexandria · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases that spread through the bloodstream, known as bloodstream infections (BSIs), are a major global health problem. Positive outcomes for patients with sepsis are typically the result of prompt treatment started after an early diagnosis of BSIs. In this study, we evaluated the capabilities of a portable electronic nose (E-Nose) to detect BSIs with two commonly isolated Gram-negative bacterial species, E. coli and K. pneumonia. One hundred and five blood samples were randomly collected for blood culture examinations using BACTEC and VITEK 2 system, and headspace analysis by an E-Nose from June to December 2021. Classification accuracy of E. coli, K. pneumonia, and negative controls was measured using principal component analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity analysis. After incubation for 24 h, cluster plots generated using principal component analysis demonstrated that E-Nose could accurately diagnose the presence of E. coli and K. pneumonia in BACTEC blood culture bottles with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in just 120 s. The E-Nose method has been shown to be an immediate, precise, and cost-effective alternative to automated blood culture BACTEC and VITEK 2 systems for the fast detection of the causative bacterial pathogens of BSIs in clinical practice. Thus, patients with such Gram-negative bacteremia can have guided empirical antimicrobial therapy on the same day of BSIs diagnosis, which can be lifesaving.

Indexed as

BacteremiaPneumoniaSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsElectronic NoseEscherichia coliHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsBACTECE. coliElectronic nose (E-Nose)K. pneumoniaVITEK 2

Identifiers

PMID37872278
PMCPMC10689606
OpenAlexW4387873912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.