ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024
Episignatures in practice: independent evaluation of published episignatures for the molecular diagnostics of ten neurodevelopmental disorders.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Epigenomics in Rare Diseases: Interpreting DNA Methylation Episignatures.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Review
- Population-scale detection of methylation outliers from long-read genome sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Familial pneumothorax in twins with Tatton-Brown-Rahman DNMT3A overgrowth syndrome.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Identification of an episignature for CHD3-related Snijders Blok-Campeau syndrome reveals heterogeneity in the CHARGE syndrome episignature: towards a better characterisation of chromatinopathies.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis Methods for Diagnosing Rare Neurodevelopmental Diseases with Episignatures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Fabry Disease: A Thematic Analysis Linking Differential Methylation Profiles and Genetic Modifiers to Disease Phenotype.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- DNA methylation and machine learning: challenges and perspective toward enhanced clinical diagnostics.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- DNA Methylation at a Single Locus of Human Genome Accurately Recapitulates Episignature of CREBBP-Related Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Worth the Effort: Lessons for Discovery and Care From an Unusual Case of Gorlin Syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- 5-mC DNA methylation in neurodevelopment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic implications.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Dominant variants in major spliceosome U4 and U5 small nuclear RNA genes cause neurodevelopmental disorders through splicing disruption.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Navigating an Uninformative Genomic Test Result: A Practical Guide.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Review
- Looking back at 2024 in the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- DNA methylation biomarkers of intellectual/developmental disability across the lifespan.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Review
- Diagnostic utility of single-locus DNA methylation mark in Sotos syndrome developed by nanopore sequencing-based episignature.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of long-read sequencing-based episignature detection in developmental disorders.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Methylation assay in KMT2B-related dystonia: a novel diagnostic validation tool.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- A new blood DNA methylation signature for Koolen-de Vries syndrome: Classification of missense KANSL1 variants and comparison to fibroblast cells.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Using exomes better.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- 2023 in the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
98 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a significant issue for the molecular diagnosis of rare diseases. The publication of episignatures as effective biomarkers of certain Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders has raised hopes to help classify VUS. However, prediction abilities of most published episignatures have not been independently investigated yet, which is a prerequisite for an informed and rigorous use in a diagnostic setting. We generated DNA methylation data from 101 carriers of (likely) pathogenic variants in ten different genes, 57 VUS carriers, and 25 healthy controls. Combining published episignature information and new validation data with a k-nearest-neighbour classifier within a leave-one-out scheme, we provide unbiased specificity and sensitivity estimates for each of the signatures. Our procedure reached 100% specificity, but the sensitivities unexpectedly spanned a very large spectrum. While ATRX, DNMT3A, KMT2D, and NSD1 signatures displayed a 100% sensitivity, CREBBP-RSTS and one of the CHD8 signatures reached <40% sensitivity on our dataset. Remaining Cornelia de Lange syndrome, KMT2A, KDM5C and CHD7 signatures reached 70-100% sensitivity at best with unstable performances, suffering from heterogeneous methylation profiles among cases and rare discordant samples. Our results call for cautiousness and demonstrate that episignatures do not perform equally well. Some signatures are ready for confident use in a diagnostic setting. Yet, it is imperative to characterise the actual validity perimeter and interpretation of each episignature with the help of larger validation sample sizes and in a broader set of episignatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.