ArticleScientific reports2023
Predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: CASPRI and GO-FAR scores.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with good neurological outcomes in survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock patients with and without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Gulf region registry analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- POTEC (Platelet Count, Oxygen Saturation, Time of CPR, Elective Surgery, and Initial ETCOJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex differences in neurological outcomes for patients with In-Hospital cardiac arrest.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Validation of CASPRI, GO-FAR, PIHCA scores in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest; A five-year three center retrospective study in IRAN.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is important to predict the neurological prognoses of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients immediately after recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to make further critical management. The aim of this study was to confirm the usefulness of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Post-Resuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) and Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) scores for predicting the IHCA immediately after the ROSC. This is a retrospective analysis of patient data from a tertiary general hospital located in South Korea. A total of 488 adult patients who had IHCA and achieved sustained ROSC from September 2016 to August 2021 were analyzed to compare effectiveness of the CASPRI and GO-FAR scores related to neurologic prognosis. The primary outcome was Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score at discharge, defined as a CPC score of 1 or 2. The secondary outcomes were survival-to-discharge and normal neurological status or minimal neurological damage at discharge. Of the 488 included patients, 85 (20.8%) were discharged with good prognoses (CPC score of 1 or 2). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of CASPRI score for the prediction of a good neurological outcome was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.81), whereas that of GO-FAR score was 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.73). The results of this study show that these scoring systems can be used for timely and satisfactory prediction of the neurological prognoses of IHCA patients after ROSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.