Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872086›Full record

ArticleZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology2023

[Expert consensus on precise diagnosis and management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced stage (2023 version)].

National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Society of Hepatology, Beijing Medical Association, Translational Medicine Branch, China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases
Society of Hepatology, Beijing Medical Association
Translational Medicine Branch, China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

not matching with chinese abstract stage in China. By adopting the "Delphi" consensus formation method, a set of precise staging criteria and corresponding preferred treatment protocols were agreed upon for Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced stage, taking into account different tumor characteristics, vascular embolism grading, distant metastasis and liver function status, portal hypertension, hepatitis B virus replication status, etc., as well as the prognosis of the patients. This consensus is intended to provide a more detailed, scientific, and reasonable reference basis for the selection of individualized diagnosis and treatment plans for frontline clinicians.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsChinaHumansPrognosisExpert consensusHepatocellular carcinomaImmunotherapyPrecise managementTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID37872086
PMCPMC12850657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.