Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37871965›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Dissociating the Contributions of Frontal Eye Field Activity to Spatial Working Memory and Motor Preparation.

Donatas Jonikaitis, Behrad Noudoost, Tirin Moore

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Differential Coding of Associative Memory Information in the Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensory reformatting for a working visual memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Marmoset Anterior Cingulate Area 32 Neurons Exhibit Responses to Presented and Produced Calls during Naturalistic Vocal Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Working Memory Updating in the Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Robust encoding of stimulus-response mapping by neurons in visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donatas JonikaitisDepartment of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94350.
Behrad NoudoostDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132.
Tirin MooreDepartment of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94350 tirin@stanford.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR56EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2009 to 2009
$398k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons within dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) of primates are characterized by robust persistent spiking activity exhibited during the delay period of working memory tasks. This includes the frontal eye field (FEF) where nearly half of the neurons are active when spatial locations are held in working memory. Past evidence has established the FEF's contribution to the planning and triggering of saccadic eye movements as well as to the control of visual spatial attention. However, it remains unclear whether persistent delay activity reflects a similar dual role in movement planning and visuospatial working memory. We trained male monkeys to alternate between different forms of a spatial working memory task which could dissociate remembered stimulus locations from planned eye movements. We tested the effects of inactivation of FEF sites on behavioral performance in the different tasks. Consistent with previous studies, FEF inactivation impaired the execution of memory-guided saccades (MGSs), and impaired performance when remembered locations matched the planned eye movement. In contrast, memory performance was largely unaffected when the remembered location was dissociated from the correct eye movement response. Overall, the inactivation effects demonstrated clear deficits in eye movements, regardless of task type, but little or no evidence of a deficit in spatial working memory. Thus, our results indicate that persistent delay activity in the FEF contributes primarily to the preparation of eye movements and not to spatial working memory.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeMemory, Short-TermAnimalsEye MovementsMaleNeuronsSaccadesprefrontal cortexpremotorshort-term memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37871965
PMCPMC10727190
OpenAlexW4387872985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.