Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37871572›Full record

Observational studyBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2023

X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia

Diana Ramírez, Víctor Ramos, Sandra Navarro, Adriana Montealegre, Julia Arciniegas

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana RamírezDepartamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. diana.marcela88@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8166-6821
Víctor RamosDepartamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-2461
Sandra NavarroDepartamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-8972
Adriana MontealegreDepartamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-2701
Julia ArciniegasFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.ORCID 0000-0002-5480-4974
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COHospital Universitario San Ignacio · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Radiographs are still widely used, underestimating the risks. This situation is frequent in neonatal care units, generating radiation doses than in adults. Objective: To quantify the received radiation doses when performing radiographs on neonates and the possible factors associated with higher doses. Materials and methods: We performed an observational study of 160 neonates from the newborn unit of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. We considered the input dose of each radiograph as the dependent variable. Patients were characterized and a multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression was performed to identify associated factors. Results: We analyzed 160 newborns and 492 radiographs. The most frequent findings were male patients (n=87, 54.4%), cesarean delivery (n=122, 76.3%), and radiograph indication for respiratory distress (n=123, 24.9%). One-point eight percent of the patients (n=9) did not have radiograph indication. The most frequently taken radiograph was chest (322, 65.4%). Most radiographs were taken with a computerized equipment (n=352, 71.5%), compared to a digital one (n=140, 28.4%). The median input dose with computerized equipment was 0.112 mGy (0.022, 0.134 mGy), and with the digital equipment was 0.020 mGy (0.019, 0.022 mGy). Conclusions: The general and specific absorbed radiation doses were measured in neonates with a computerized and a digital equipment. We identified higher doses with the computerized equipment. In addition, it was recognized the correlation between computerized radiography equipment with lower corrected gestational ages as the main factor for dose increase.

Indexed as

HospitalsColombiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRadiation DosageRadiographyX-Raysinfantnewbornradiationradiation dosagradiographyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37871572
PMCPMC10620001
OpenAlexW4387827576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.