Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37871570›Full record

ReviewBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2023

Chlamydia psittaci seropositivity in workers exposed to birds and review of the literature: Evidence of circulation in Antioquia

Ana Claudia Ossa-Giraldo, Xiomara Úsuga-Perilla, Jhon Sebastián Correa, Juan A Segura

Open access · diamondAbstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection ofItalian journal of food safety · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-Term Surveillance ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Antiviral Effects of Avian Interferon-Stimulated Genes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Claudia Ossa-GiraldoGrupo Infettare, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. anaca0519@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-9359
Xiomara Úsuga-PerillaGrupo Infettare, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. xiomyup@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-9967
Jhon Sebastián CorreaGrupo Infettare, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. sebasco3510@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4236-047X
Juan A SeguraGrupo Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. juan.segura@colmayor.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-5724
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia · COInstitución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Psittacosis is a zoonotic disease caused by Chlamydia psittaci, a bacterium classified as an agent with bioterrorist potential. It has caused multiple outbreaks in exposed poultry workers around the world. Colombia has no epidemiological follow-up of the infection and a big knowledge gap. Objectives: To determine the antibodies’ frequency against C. psittaci in workers with occupational exposure to birds and to review the literature on studies conducted in Colombia. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical intent on workers in contact with birds and reviewed the related literature in Colombia. IgM and IgG serum antibodies against C. psittaci were detected by microimmunofluorescence. The sociodemographic and exposure characteristics were expressed as frequencies and summary measures. Associated factors were explored by bivariate and multivariate analysis. The scientific and gray literature review was done with a structured search. Results: We analyzed 54 workers in contact with birds. Antibody prevalence was 31.5%. Slaughtering and evisceration by non-veterinarians was a risk factor for antibody presence. There are only four previous studies on C. psittaci in Colombia. Conclusions: Here, we present the first evidence of C. psittaci circulation among workers exposed to birds in Antioquia and the second report in the country. These findings contribute to the “One Health” public health strategy.

Indexed as

Chlamydophila psittaciPsittacosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBirdsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAntibodies, BacterialbirdsChlamydophila psittaciimmunoglobulin Gimmunoglobulin Moccupational exposureone healthPsittacosisseroepidemiologic studies

Identifiers

PMID37871570
PMCPMC10629862
OpenAlexW4387827579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.