ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2023
Patient-Perceived Hand Function Can Predict Treatment for Dupuytren Disease.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations of Demographic, Lifestyle, and Clinical Factors With the Presence of Dupuytren Disease: Results from the Lifelines Cohort Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeb-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) could help surgeons remotely assess the need for examination and subsequent treatment of patients with Dupuytren disease (DD). The authors studied whether the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) could predict DD treatment.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, the authors compared MHQ and URAM scores of treated patients with those of untreated patients. For the treatment group, the authors selected a score closest to 1 year before treatment. For controls, the authors randomly selected a score. The authors also tested the predictive value of a 1-year change score between 15 months and 6 weeks before treatment. The primary outcome measure was DD treatment. The predictive value was determined using the area under the curve (AUC). An AUC greater than 0.70 was considered good predictive ability; 0.70 to 0.50, poor predictive ability; and less than 0.50, no predictive ability.
resultsThe authors included 141 patients for the MHQ analysis and 145 patients for the URAM analysis. The AUC of the MHQ and URAM scores measured 1 year before treatment were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.88) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.82), respectively. The 1-year change score resulted in an AUC less than 0.60 for both questionnaires.
conclusionsThe results show that both the MHQ and URAM score measured around 1 year before treatment can predict treatment for DD. If future studies show that telemonitoring of patients with DD with PROMs is also cost-effective, web-based PROMs could optimize patient care and effectiveness of DD treatment. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.